In the article “Put your money where your mouths are” by
Nicholas Kristoff the claims he makes are that ending child labor is not as beneficial
for the child as we think it might be. He claims that while child labor is bad
there are other reasons behind it, such as education, that we must fix before
we can end child labor, otherwise, the children and their families end up in an
even worse situation. He gives two reasons as evidence one being the garment
making industry in Bangladesh and the second is the production of soccer balls
in Pakistan. In both situations the children and their families suffered after
the U.S. ended both of these industries. Without these jobs the children have
nothing else. Some of the assumptions Kristoff makes are our views and believe
on child labor he assumes that the readers think that child labor is wrong and
there are no benefits to child labor. Another assumption is that we know about
industries in other countries and that the U.S. has made regulations and laws
that have banned these industries. He assumes we have knowledge of these
countries and what goes on in them. He also assumes that all of us have “self-righteous
indignation” and that we don’t really understand how the world works when many
of the readers and the people he calls self-righteous may actually have a good
understanding of the situation and may be doing all they can to change what is
happening.
I also thought the author of "Put your money where your money where your mouths are", made a lot of assumptions during his paper. I enjoyed your blog post and thoughts on the paper.
ReplyDeleteI like your post and agree with a lot of it. I found that there were quite a bit of assumptions made by the author. I think that labeling people as self-righteous while they make good-intentioned efforts is counter-productive.
ReplyDelete