The essay, “ Put Your
Money Where Their Mouths Are”, by Nicholas D. Kristof, is a well written
opinion essay that answers key questions that every opinionated essay should
contain. A good opinion essay should
make a claim that is backed up by reasons, as well, as having assumptions that precede
it. These three things (claims, reasons,
and assumptions) are can be found in the thesis of the paper as well as in the
body of the paper itself. In this
specific case most of the information about the claims, reasons, and
assumptions of the paper are found in the body of the essay.
The
first thing that must be addressed in the paper is the claim. The claim is usually the statement that the
author is arguing for. In this specific
case, the author is not supportive of international child labor laws. The author makes it very clear that child
labor is important in certain parts of the world. Second, there must be reasons
behind the claim. The author in this
essay supports his claims through a couple different reasons, such as, how some
third world countries have no schools, and how some families need the child’s
income to put food on the table. These
reasons were well backed up in the paper through examples of how implicated
child labor laws affected third world families. Finally, the author makes some
assumptions in his paper. In this paper
the author assumes his audience knows that there is controversy over child
labor laws. He also assumes that the audience knows some of the history behind
the argument of labor laws. With the
claim, reasons, and assumptions well addressed, few questions are left to be
asked about the content of the paper.
One question that might be asked is, can the U.N. World Food Program
help send kids through high school instead of fourth grade, if enough money is
donated? This could be a potential question for the writer. Overall, this essay
is very well written and address many of the questions a reader might have
along the way.
I agree that it was well written but i think the author shouldn't have attacked the other side. It might have been more helpful to convince them.
ReplyDelete