Thursday, February 14, 2013

Why "Buying into the Green Movement" works


Because of me wanting to join half the class and do the most popular article, I am analyzing "Buying into the Green Movement" by Alex Williams. My thesis statement for the moment is as follows: Alex Williams is successful in using irony and exaggeration as devices to convey his points and subliminally convince those with an interest in the green movement to take more action other than just buying eco products. There was a bit of internal debate of whether or not the article really works to convey its message. The main problem that I had was his concluding statement that people who are buying the products view it as a first step and want to do more. To me this seems to undermine the article's call to action by making it sound like people are already moving towards reducing consumption. While mentioning it alone doesn't add to the mix, the fact that it's the last taste that the reader has from the article seems to pull the rug from under the article. However, when considering the overall article and its great use of exaggeration and pointing to the sheer irony of people effectively making no change in the environment by buying products illustrates his point well and leaves memorable bits of information that still sway the reader. He constantly goes through the shopping lists of the eco-minded to appeal his point and is very successful at showing how the products don't contribute to solving the true problem. In spite of the Achilles’s heel, the article still manages to pull it off by presenting a colorful and expressive view of the situation.

1 comment:

  1. I read this article as well and I think Williams doesn't do a great job with his concluding statement. I feel the same way you do, that Williams somewhat undermines the articles call to action with this statement. I think Williams could definitely change this to where he doesn't make it sound like people are already making changes. By saying this it doesn't promote people to make a change themselves because a change is already being made. I did think it was a very interesting article.

    ReplyDelete