The article I have read is “Behind the ‘Illegal
Alien’ Label, Real Kids with a Lot to Contribute” by Marcos Brenton. In this
article it seems like there is no clear thesis and it seems as though the
article is just trying to imply one. If there was a line in this article that
best stated what this article was trying to argue it would be, “The very term ‘illegal
alien’ is like blood dumped in shark-infested waters” (Brenton). This article tries to convince it’s audience
that names that illegal immigrants are called are stereotypical and unfair to
the many “honor students” (Brenton) that come into our country. The author also
tries to state that the term “illegal alien” is just rhetoric trying to get
people to dislike all illegal immigrants from coming into our country. I for
one see his point in this but is does not change the fact that they are coming
illegally and for free when many other immigrants are sacrificing and paying
much to come to this country legally. I can see why the author does not mention
this, because it would weaken his argument.
So instead, he simply goes on using other examples that try to prove his
point that many people might be able to agree to. The author mentions drug
lords briefly and he mainly tries to tag the illegal immigrants as honor
students and hard workers. Which may be true in many cases but it is always
important to realize that there are drugs coming across the border and that’s a
bigger problem than just mere social labels.
It seems like the author is probably using a lot of fallacies to try and convince the audience about the illegal immigrants.
ReplyDeleteIt sounds like an interesting article. There are definitely multiple sides of the illegal immigration argument that have to be analyzed.
ReplyDelete